aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/report
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'report')
-rw-r--r--report/report.tex13
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/report/report.tex b/report/report.tex
index 925b17f..33b7495 100644
--- a/report/report.tex
+++ b/report/report.tex
@@ -37,6 +37,19 @@
\newpage
\section{Introduction}
+Sorting is one of the most fundamental operations in programming. Sorting algorithms play a crucial role
+in efficient searching, organization and interpretation of data, and optimization problems. Furthermore,
+sorting is often times the first step towards designing complicated algorithms in computer science. This
+project aims to study efficient sorting of a list of coordinates by the second value of each coordinate,
+in Assembly. Although abstract high level languages such as Python and Java allow faster and convenient development,
+Assembly provides precise control over program flow, memory usage and instruction level execution, making Assembly an excellent
+evironment for benchmarking and performance analysis. In this project the two algorithms quick-sort and insertion-sort
+will be implemented and compared against each other. Quick-sort is expected to excel on large random datasets,
+while insertion-sort is more suitable for small or nearly sorted cases.
+Several test
+instances consisting of uniformly random coordinates will be created with the goal of comparing the implementations
+actual runtime to their theoretical runtimes. These datasets will be ranging from 10,000 to 5,000,000 elements, including edge
+cases with duplicates or nearly sorted lists.
\section{Design}
\section{Implementation}
\section{Evaluation}